Abstract

PurposeInvasive breast cancers are thought to arise from in situ lesions, but some ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are indolent with low likelihood of progressing to invasive carcinoma. Comparison of risk factor associations between DCIS and invasive disease may elucidate which factors influence early versus late stages of carcinogenesis. Therefore, we determined whether there were differences in risk factor profiles for screen-detected DCIS and invasive breast cancer among Luminal A lesions.MethodsWe conducted a case-control analysis using data from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (1993–2001). Analyses were restricted to Luminal A tumors and screen-detected tumors among mammography-eligible women, to limit confounding by mode of detection (N = 108 DCIS; N = 203 invasive). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between risk factors and lesion type.ResultsIn stratified analyses, we observed qualitative differences in the direction of association for ever smoking, obese BMI, high waist-to-hip-ratio (WHR), and ≥10 years of oral contraceptive use between DCIS and invasive disease. Breastfeeding was inversely associated with invasive disease and was not associated with DCIS. Interaction tests for risk factor associations between Luminal A DCIS and invasive breast cancer were not statistically significant (p>0.05).ConclusionsAmong Luminal A tumors, established breast cancer risk factors may exert stronger effects on progression of early lesions to invasive disease, with lesser effects on risk of DCIS.

Highlights

  • Breast carcinogenesis theories state that invasive breast cancers may arise from pre-invasive lesions, such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), which has increased in incidence in the last two decades due to increased screening.[1, 2] DCIS lesions harbor molecular changes that characterize invasive breast cancers; yet not all DCIS progress into invasive disease.[3,4,5] Anderson et al (2004) performed a detailed analysis of incident DCIS and invasive breast cancer to assess the hypothesis that all invasive cancers have an in situ phase

  • Interaction tests for risk factor associations between Luminal A DCIS and invasive breast cancer were not statistically significant (p>0.05)

  • Others have argued that CIS is not an obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer due to a low probability of developing invasive breast cancer after CIS diagnosis[6], variable rates of diagnoses of invasive breast cancer after DCIS ranging from 14–53%[7,8,9,10], and autopsy studies reporting that 6–18% of the population may have undetected DCIS at the time of death.[11, 12]

Read more

Summary

Methods

We conducted a case-control analysis using data from the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (1993–2001). Analyses were restricted to Luminal A tumors and screen-detected tumors among mammography-eligible women, to limit confounding by mode of detection (N = 108 DCIS; N = 203 invasive). Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations between risk factors and lesion type

Results
Introduction
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call