Abstract
BackgroundWe aimed to determine risk factors associated with rates of contaminated blood cultures in the emergency department (ED). MethodsThis single-center, cohort study of 1098 consecutive patients ≥ 20 years of age was performed in the ED of university hospital over a 26-month period. ResultsWe analyzed 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Potential contamination was identified in 172 (8.2%) of the 2096 pairs of blood cultures. Multivariate analysis revealed more frequent contamination when puncture sites were disinfected with povidone-iodine (PVI) than with alcohol/chlorhexidine gluconate (adjusted odds ratio, 7.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–10.7; P < 0.001). Femoral and central venous catheters showed more frequent contamination than peripheral venous sites. Blood collection by first- or second-year residents did not show an increase in contaminated blood cultures. ConclusionsRates of contaminated blood cultures were significantly associated with PVI and specific sites, but were not significantly associated with blood collection by residents.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
