Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the risk factors for anorectal dysfunction after intersphincteric resection in patients with low rectal cancer.Methods: A total of 251 patients who underwent intersphincteric resection from July 2014 to June 2020 were included in this study, for which the Kirwan's grade, Wexner score, and anorectal manometric index were used to evaluate the anorectal function and other parameters including demographics, surgical features, and clinical and pathological characteristics. These parameters were analysed to explore the potential risk factors for anorectal function after intersphincteric resection.Results: In the 251 included patients, 98 patients underwent partial intersphincteric resection, 87 patients underwent subtotal intersphincteric resection, and 66 patients underwent total intersphincteric resection. There were 53 (21.1%) patients who had postoperative complications, while no significant difference was observed between the three groups. Furthermore, 30 patients (45.5%) in the total intersphincteric resection group were classified as having anorectal dysfunction (Kirwan's grade 3–5), which was significantly higher than that in the partial intersphincteric resection group (27.6%) and subtotal intersphincteric resection group (29.9%). The mean Wexner score of patients that underwent total intersphincteric resection was 7.9, which was higher than that of patients that had partial intersphincteric resection (5.9, p = 0.002) and subtotal intersphincteric resection (6.4, p = 0.027). The initial perceived volume was lower in the total intersphincteric resection group than in the partial and subtotal intersphincteric resection groups at 1, 3, and 6 months after intersphincteric resection. In addition, the resting pressure, maximum squeeze pressure, and maximum tolerated volume in the total intersphincteric resection group were worse than those in the partial and subtotal groups at 3 and 6 months after intersphincteric resection. Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that an age ≥65, total intersphincteric resection, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy were independent risk factors for anorectal dysfunction (P = 0.023, P = 0.003, and P = 0.008, respectively). Among the 66 patients who underwent total intersphincteric resection, 17 patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy, of which 12 patients (70.6%) were classified as having anorectal dysfunction.Conclusion: The current study concluded that age ≥65, total intersphincteric resection, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy were risk factors for anorectal dysfunction after intersphincteric resection. The morbidity of anorectal dysfunction after total intersphincteric resection for patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy was relatively high, and the indication should be carefully evaluated.

Highlights

  • Abdominoperineal resection is regarded as a standard procedure for curative surgical treatment in patients with low rectal cancer

  • As the flow diagram of patient selection shows (Figure 1), a total of 266 patients were included according to the inclusion criteria, while 11 patients were excluded according to the exclusion criteria, and four patients were lost to follow-up

  • Tumour regression after preoperative CRT was assessed by the tumour regression grade provided by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the College of American Pathologists [14]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Abdominoperineal resection is regarded as a standard procedure for curative surgical treatment in patients with low rectal cancer. With the development and application of laparoscopic and robotic systems for the resection of low rectal cancer, the ISR has become one of the most popular anus-preserving procedures. Previous evidence has indicated that its clinical and oncological outcomes are similar to abdominoperineal resection (APR), and the anal functional outcome is suggested to be acceptable [1, 4, 5]. Previous studies have shown that ∼42% of patients experience major bowel dysfunction after ISR, indicating that the functional outcomes may be the main risk of undergoing ISR rather than oncological outcomes [7]. To explore the potential factors that might influence anorectal function after ISR, we retrospectively analysed clinicopathological characteristics, surgical features, postoperative complications, and functional indicators in this study

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call