Abstract

Background Although the clinical features of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection are well described, the specific clinical characteristics of polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection have been rarely reported. The objective of this study was to examine the risk factors for and clinical outcomes of polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection. Methods A retrospective observational study was performed from January 2013 to December 2018 in a tertiary hospital. All patients with Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection were enrolled, and the data were collected from the electronic medical records. Results A total of 594 patients were included, 21% (126/594) of whom had polymicrobial infection. The most common copathogen was Klebsiella pneumoniae (20.81%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16.78%) and Enterococcus faecium (12.08%). Compared with monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection, polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection mostly originated from the skin and soft tissue (28.6% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that burn injury was independently associated with polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection (adjusted odds ratio, 3.569; 95% confidence interval, 1.954-6.516). Patients with polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection were more likely to have a longer hospital length of stay [40 (21, 68) vs. 27 (16, 45), p < 0.001] and more hospitalization days after bloodstream infection than those with monomicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection [22 (8, 50) vs. 13 (4, 28), p < 0.001]. However, no significant difference in mortality was observed between the two groups. Conclusions Approximately one-fifth of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections were polymicrobial in this cohort. The main sources were skin and soft tissue infections, and burn injury was the only independent risk factor. Although mortality did not differ between the groups, considering the limitations of the study, further studies are required to assess the impact of polymicrobial (vs. monomicrobial) Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection on outcomes.

Highlights

  • The clinical features of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection are well described, the specific clinical characteristics of polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection have been rarely reported

  • From January 2013 to December 2018, a total of 1353 blood culture samples positive for Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) were initially identified, and 594 patients with AB-Bloodstream infection (BSI) were recruited for analysis

  • A total of 96.1% of the patients (571/594) had at least one comorbidity, and a significantly higher rate of burn injury was observed in the polymicrobial AB-BSI group than in the monomicrobial AB-BSI group (23.0% vs. 8.3%, p < 0:05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The clinical features of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection are well described, the specific clinical characteristics of polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection have been rarely reported. The objective of this study was to examine the risk factors for and clinical outcomes of polymicrobial Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection. Mortality did not differ between the groups, considering the limitations of the study, further studies are required to assess the impact of polymicrobial (vs monomicrobial) Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection on outcomes. A higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score and a higher frequency of severe sepsis/septic shock are more often observed in patients with polymicrobial BSI than in those with monomicrobial BSI [16, 17], the difference in the mortality rate between the two populations is controversial [15, 18–20]. Only one previous study has evaluated the impact of polymicrobial AB-BSI on clinical outcomes [21]; comparisons of the characteristics of and risk factors for polymicrobial vs monomicrobial infections are lacking [15]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.