Abstract

BackgroundTheoretically, potential errors in femoral component (FC) sizing can affect postoperative functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain, and flexion stability. Incidences of asymmetrical femoral components (AFC) in bilateral TKA have been reported; however; there is a lack of data on exactly why AFC size selection may differ in patients who have had posterior referencing system bilateral TKA. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine risk factors of AFC size selection in patients specifically undergoing posterior referencing bilateral TKA and to compare clinical outcomes between those with AFC or symmetrical femoral component (SFC) sizes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective matched-pair study comparing thirty-four patients who had undergone simultaneous and staged bilateral TKA using AFC size (Group I) and thirty-five patients with SFC size (Group II). Patients were matched according to gender, body mass index, prosthesis type, and operative technique. Preoperative radiographic morphology of both distal femurs including anteroposterior/mediolateral diameters, anterior-posterior femoral offset, and postoperative radiographic data of FC comprising flexion and valgus angle were recorded. The postoperative functional outcomes including ROM, anterior knee pain, knee society score, and functional score at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months were compared.ResultsThere were no differences in morphology between left and right distal femurs from preoperative radiographic data in both groups. The postoperative radiograph showed a significantly greater FC flexion angle difference in Group I vs. Group II (2.18° ± 1.29° and 1.36° ± 1.08° P = 0.007), while the other parameters were the same. The postoperative clinical outcomes displayed no distinction between groups.ConclusionThe factor primarily associated with AFC size selection in bilateral TKAs is the difference in FC flexion angle but not the morphological diversity between sides. The postoperative functional outcomes were not inferior in AFC patients in comparison with SFC patients.

Highlights

  • Potential errors in femoral component (FC) sizing can affect postoperative functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain, and flexion stability

  • We found that the knee society score (KSS), functional score and postoperative ROM were similar between asymmetrical femoral components (AFC) size and symmetrical femoral component (SFC) size for patients; these findings are in agreement with previous studies [9, 10]

  • Our study showed that flexion of the femoral component and not preoperative bone anatomy determined the size of the AFC in patients undergoing bilateral TKA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Potential errors in femoral component (FC) sizing can affect postoperative functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including range of motion (ROM), anterior knee pain, and flexion stability. This study was conducted to determine risk factors of AFC size selection in patients undergoing posterior referencing bilateral TKA and to compare clinical outcomes between those with AFC or symmetrical femoral component (SFC) sizes. The femoral component size affects the flexion gap, stability, range of motion (ROM) and functional outcome after surgery. Too large of a femoral component can limit the ROM, create a painful and stiff knee, lead to anterior knee pain with patellar overstuff, and result in a poor functional outcome [4, 5]. In the mediolateral (ML) plane, too small of a component creates an under hang which may result in subsiding of the component, increased bleeding from the raw surface, and, osteolysis [6] whilst too large of a femoral component enhances component overhang and may increase knee pain [5, 7]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call