Abstract
Objectives: To assess the difference in incidence and duration of facial nerve palsy following parotidectomy comparing ENT and non-ENT surgeons. Methods: Retrospective case note review of patients undergoing parotidectomy in a UK district general hospital between January 1993 and November 2000. Patients with malignant histology or those undergoing revision surgeries were excluded. Results: A total of 178 patients underwent total or partial parotidectomy in the study period; 137 patients met the inclusion criteria. Ninety-three (68%) had surgery performed by ENT surgeons and 44 (32%) by non-ENT surgeons (general surgeons and maxillofacial surgeons). In the ENT operated group, 52 (56%) had temporary postoperative facial nerve palsy; 2 (2%) had permanent facial palsy in one or more divisions; 39 (42%) had intact facial nerve function postoperatively. In the non-ENT group, 25 (57%) had temporary facial palsy; 3 (7%) suffered permanent facial palsy in one or more divisions; 16 (36%) had intact facial nerve function postoperatively. These differences were not statistically significant ( P = 0.43, Fischer’s Exact test). In addition, the mean duration of temporary facial palsy (18 weeks in the ENT operated group and 26 weeks in the non-ENT operated group) and incidence of other postoperative complications (hematoma, neuroma, Frey’s syndrome, and salivary fistula) were also not statistically significant. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the observed rate of postoperative facial nerve palsy and other known complications following parotid surgery performed by ENT and non-ENT surgeons in our series.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.