Abstract

The medium of film is well established for education and communication about hazardous phenomena as it provides engaging ways to directly view hazards and their impacts. Empirical analysis can help to understand films' effectiveness in informing populations at risk and catalysing action to reduce risk.Using volcanic eruptions as a focus, an evidence-based methodology was devised to create, use, and track the outcomes of digital film tools designed to raise hazard and risk awareness, and develop preparedness efforts. Experiences from two contrasting eruptions were documented, with the secondary purpose of fostering social and cultural memories of eruptions, developed in response to demand from at-risk communities during field-based research. The films were created as a partnership with local volcano monitoring scientists and at-risk populations who, consequently, became the leading focus of the films, thus offering a substantial contrast to other types of hazard communication.The films were analysed by sharing them with at-risk communities and evaluating the immediate influence on learning and affect. Results indicated that the use of local content and actors to share experiences and teach valuable lessons were inspirational. Recognizable faces and spaces helped to convey disaster risk reduction messages. They also motivated audiences to consider ownership of risk and potential actions to reduce risk and strengthen resilience.This study demonstrated the effectiveness of co-production in the design and execution of intervention strategies for volcanic risk reduction. Co-production of films with local agencies resulted in products that were contextually appropriate, meaningful for audiences, and useful risk communication tools.

Highlights

  • The creation of disaster-resilient communities is partly dependent upon strategies to effectively communicate hazard and risk

  • On St Vincent, we focused more on hazard and risk awareness and produced 6 very short (1-2 minutes) films tailored to particular problems or topics that had been identified through previous research and community engagement (Armijos and Few 2016, Crosweller 2009)

  • Pre and post-screening surveys were conducted with all attendees at the St Vincent workshops, but only a representative sample of attendees (3045%) were surveyed in Nuevo Rio Claro and La Nueva Primavera (Table 3). This was both because the Colombian groups were too large to complete a 100% survey, and due to the sensitive nature of the films necessitating longer discussion in smaller groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The creation of disaster-resilient communities is partly dependent upon strategies to effectively communicate hazard and risk. Different strategies may be chosen if the primary goal is to raise awareness of specific risks in an emergency setting, or to enhance understanding of hazardous processes in advance of an emergency; to build trust or to encourage mitigative action (Rowan 1991, Barclay et al 2015). It has been established for some time that communication, with the aim of encouraging risk reducing behaviour, will have more success if it is rooted in the socio-cultural context in which the risk is understood (Morgan et al 2002, Beck 1992). To support decision making that improves responses to hazardous events, or change attitudes or behaviours, the public need both to participate in discussion around risk, and be exposed to information that is both salient and relevant to them (Scherer et al 1999)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call