Abstract
Regulation imposes both direct and indirect costs. Regulators have to be conscious of these costs and the finite resources available to them. The paper outlines the way in which the Financial Services Authority (FSA) has developed a system of financial supervision under which resources are directed to those issues, firms and consumers which pose the greatest risks or opportunities when judged against its statutory objectives. The application of a risk‐based approach to supervision is effectively required by a number of principles of good regulation enshrined in legislation along with a requirement to undertake cost‐benefit analysis when devising new rules. As well as informing high‐level aims, the paper shows how the risk‐based approach, through the FSA’s planning and budget process and firm specific risk assessments, affects decisions on supervisory issues and resource allocation. It also outlines how the FSA will account to government for its performance.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
