Abstract
Risk assessment pervades our daily lives. Insurance companies and anti-terrorism specialists make their livelihoods by guessing at the likelihood of catastrophic events. All players in the criminal justice system have also routinely — and informally — used risk assessment. In setting a sentence, courts consider the recidivism risk an offender presents; parole authorities attempt to ascertain how likely a potential parolee is to re-offend; presidents and governors assess the likelihood a convicted offender will commit further crimes after receiving a pardon. In the past, however, risk assessment has been an informal process, in some cases assisted through the clinical judgments of psychologists and psychiatrists. Increasingly, it is now being supplemented with statistical data and actuarial methods. The authors in this Issue discuss currently used methodologies in assessing risk and address the application of risk assessment at different points of the criminal justice system. While some of the authors focus on sex offenders, risk assessment is much more broadly applicable, as others indicate. What are the advantages of risk assessment in sentencing and post conviction? What pitfalls does risk assessment present?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.