Abstract
Design-build contractors are challenged with the task of minimizing failure risks when introducing new technical solutions or adapting technical solutions to new conditions, e.g., climate change. They seem to have a disproportional trust in suppliers and their reference cases and might not have adequate resources or methodologies for sufficient evaluation. This creates the potential for serial failures to spread in the construction industry. To mitigate this, it was suggested that a predefined risk assessment framework should be introduced with the aim of providing a prequalification and requirements for the use of the technical solution. The objectives of this paper are to develop a comprehensive risk assessment framework and to explore the framework’s potential to adequately support the design-build contractor’s decisions. The framework uses qualitative assessment, relying on expert workshops and quantitative assessments, with a focus on simulation and probabilities. Tollgates are used to communicate risk assessments to the contractor. The framework is applied to a real-life case study of construction with a CLT-structure for a Swedish design-build contractor, where exposure to precipitation during construction is a key issue. In conclusion, the chosen framework was successful in a design-build contractor context, structuring the process and identifying difficulties in achieving the functional requirements concerning moisture. Three success factors were: documentation and communication, expert involvement, and the use of tollgates. Recommendations to the design-build contractor on construction of CLT structure are to keep construction period short and to use full weather protection on site.
Highlights
It is challenging to successfully introduce new technical solutions, i.e., materials, products, designs, or processes, to the construction industry [1]
This paper suggests and demonstrates a risk assessment framework to guide the design-build contractor to adequately assess new technical solutions identified to be of potential interest, with the overall aim of reducing serial failures
To explore the potential of an elaborated framework for risk assessment for implementation of new technical solutions, the framework was applied to a new technical solution in a real-life case study
Summary
It is challenging to successfully introduce new technical solutions, i.e., materials, products, designs, or processes, to the construction industry [1]. There were issues with new technical solutions that were insufficiently investigated, and when introduced to the construction industry, they failed to sustain functional requirements due to deficiencies in design or production that should be predicted by calculations or other assessments in the design phase. Multiple cases of this kind of failure were defined as serial failures in [2]. Within predefined boundaries and preset assumptions, the user can benefit from probabilistic assessment based on large sets of simulations when evaluating performance of building components; when introducing new technical solutions, these models are usually not applicable as they are based on preset boundaries
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.