Risk Assessment Applications Beyond Baseline Risks and Clean-Up Goals

Abstract

Historically, the phrase “Risk Assessment” brought to mind a thick Superfund-type baseline risk assessment or clean-up goal derivation document filled with pages of tables with endless seemingly unrelated algorithms and numbers. Over the last decade, the principles of risk and exposure assessment have gained wide-reaching acceptance and are increasingly utilized to help solve other environmental impact, occupational health, or risk mitigation design problems. The typical objective of the classic risk assessment is the evaluation of current or future risks from exposure to contaminated media within the framework of a regulatory waste management or remediation program. Risk-based techniques are increasingly being used on a voluntary basis (i.e., outside of the standard regulatory arena) to demonstrate the presence, absence, or extent of environmental or health-related concerns in specific exposure circumstances. Likewise, a risk or exposure evaluation may be useful in determining the need for, or the legitimacy of, a public health advisory, alone or in conjunction with remedial or mitigative actions. Finally, risk-based techniques often find their way into the courtroom. Three case studies are presented in which riskbased solutions were employed to assist in resolving environmental or health-related issues: (1) a reversal of a fish consumption advisory; (2) an evaluation of arsenic in soil on and adjacent to a school facility; and (3) a challenge to a case of alleged methyl bromide exposure in a litigation context. In each case, the use of risk assessment principles was employed beyond the classic baseline risk assessment to address an applied problem of toxicological significance.