Abstract

This paper enlarges upon some recent work regarding the appropriate discount rate for public projects and, in particular, shows more fully why risk should enter into the calculation. Indeed, we argue that efficient allocation of risk bearing is usually more difficult for government projects than it is for private ones. Therefore, if anything, the allowance for risk should be greater for government projects than it is for other-wise comparable private ones (assuming no distortions from competitive equilibrium). We then outline the implications of recent mean-variance asset pricing models for the project evaluation framework, providing an integration of the treat-ment of risk with Harberger's (1968) solution to the distortion problem. In the context of this theory we also offer specific arguments on the risks of different types mid classes of govern-ment projects.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.