Risk Analysis is a Prerequisite for Quality Management of Traction Rolling Stock Repairs

Vladimir Gaponov,Dmitriy Kuznetsov,Roman Alekhin,Andrey Khvostikov,S Bratan,S Roshchupkin

doi:10.1051/matecconf/202134603018

Abstract

The paper considers a new version of IRIS ISO/TS 22163:2017 standard in relation to the quality of repair of complex equipment in the railway industry. It is shown that the new version of ISO/ TS 22163:2017 standard provides for the need of organizations to conduct risk analysis and accounting in their work. The authors propose to consider as an example a well-established analysis of the types and consequences of potential defects in FMEA process. The use of FMEA analysis made it possible to consider the significance of various risks of the quality of traction rolling stock repair, as well as to establish the importance of quality control operations for impregnation of a traction motor.

Highlights

In modern conditions, the issue related to quality management of the repair of complex equipment in the railway industry and, above all, traction rolling stock, is quite relevant
It is possible to create a new approach to the repair of rolling stock and improve its quality by integrating a modern quality management system (QMS) at the enterprise, which will make it possible to manage the quality of repairs in real time
Emergence of a new version of ISO 9000-2015 series of standards revealed the current trend of improving the functioning of the existing QMS, namely, the need to take into account and assess the risks of creating new equipment and new technologies

Summary

Introduction

The issue related to quality management of the repair of complex equipment in the railway industry and, above all, traction rolling stock, is quite relevant. The new version of IRIS ISO/TS 22163:2017 standard is largely aimed at meeting consumer expectations and continuous improvement, and at the need to take risks into account when creating and repairing traction rolling stock. For the purpose of further qualitative and quantitative analysis of risks that reduce reliability and quality of repair of traction rolling stock, the authors propose to consider an example of integration into QMS of a well-proven analysis of the types and consequences of potential defects in FMEA process. The study of technological processes should include the study of documentation, and a face-to-face analysis of the situation of technological processes at workplaces

PFMEA team formation and brainstorming

Determining the causes of potential defects

Findings

Conclusions