Abstract
Risk-adjusted valuation is well established in both theory and business practice. However, its implications are not always immediately apparent or intuitive in legal disputes such as breach of contract lawsuits. In particular, damages are often calculated by discounting the differences in cash flows between but-for (no breach) and actual (breach) worlds by a single discount rate. While widely used, this approach can produce incorrect valuation results. This paper provides a case study of a breach of an electricity tolling agreement to illustrate the more general valuation principle of discounting but-for and actual cash flows using two discount rates.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
