Abstract

Simple SummaryMyelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are two blood cancers with variable symptoms of low blood counts (fatigue, bleeding, infection risk) and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Management decisions should be guided by individual patient and disease characteristics and based on validated risk stratification tools. Supportive care with red blood cell transfusions and medications to stimulate blood cell production remains the mainstay of therapy for lower-risk MDS and CMML patients. For higher-risk patients, a bone marrow transplant is the only potentially curative option, but most patients are not candidates for this intensive therapy. In this case, the hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine are standard of care. However, response rates to HMA are low and responses are only transient highlighting the need for novel approaches. While an oral version of decitabine has been recently approved, several targeted therapies are in development, but none has been approved to date.Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are two distinct blood cancers with a variable clinical symptom burden and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Management decisions should be guided by individual patient and disease characteristics and based on validated risk stratification tools. While supportive care with red blood cell transfusions, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and iron chelation remains the mainstay of therapy for lower-risk (LR)-MDS patients, luspatercept has recently been approved for transfusion-dependent anemic LR-MDS patients ending a decade without any new drug approvals for MDS. For higher-risk patients, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) remains the only curative therapy for both MDS and CMML but most patients are not eligible for allo-HCT. For those patients, the hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine remain standard of care with azacitidine being the only agent that has shown an overall survival benefit in randomized trials. Although early results from novel molecularly driven agents such as IDH1/2 inhibitors, venetoclax, magrolimab, and APR-246 for MDS as well as tagraxofusp, tipifarnib, and lenzilumab for CMML appear encouraging, confirmatory randomized trials must be completed to fully assess their safety and efficacy prior to routine clinical use. Herein, we review the current management of MDS and CMML and conclude with a critical appraisal of novel therapies and general trends in this field.

Highlights

  • Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of myeloid malignancies that are characterized by dysplasia of myeloid elements in the bone marrow, ineffective hematopoiesis leading to cytopenias, and a variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1,2]

  • While single-arm studies showed overall response rates (ORR) of 62–73% (47–50% CR) among TP53-mutated, hypomethylating agents (HMA)-naïve patients with MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), the manufacturer has recently announced that the randomized phase III trial failed to reach its primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) but the publication of trial results needs to be awaited to evaluate if there are any subgroups who might benefit from APR-246 + AZA [127,128]

  • MDS and CMML are heterogenous disorders and management decisions should be guided by individual patient and disease characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of myeloid malignancies that are characterized by dysplasia of myeloid elements in the bone marrow, ineffective hematopoiesis leading to cytopenias, and a variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1,2]. As clinical manifestations and prognosis are variable, several risk stratification tools have been developed to tailor management decisions to the individual patient with the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) and its revised version IPSSR being the most commonly used scoring tools [3,4,5]. Those clinical-pathologic scoring systems have been supplemented by genetic and molecular assessments that improve risk stratification but may be predictive of response to specific therapies such as SF3B1 mutations as a biomarker of response to luspatercept [6,7,8]. Treatment decisions for both MDS and CMML should focus on the individual patient and options range from observation to supportive care with red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) to hypomethylating agents (HMA) and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) [1,10,12,13,14]

Risk Stratification in MDS and CMML as the Basis for Treatment Selection
Lower-Risk MDS
Higher-Risk MDS
Future Directions
III II II
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call