Abstract

The financial crisis has awoken financial service organizations to the reality that when financial transactions enter their operating environments they trigger real time risk exposures that can go well beyond nominal transaction values, capital charges and other measures deemed appropriate for preventing unexpected losses. Traditional risk accounting approaches have caused lagging measures of risk to be recorded in much of managements‘ traditional performance and risk reporting systems. Conventional financial and risk management systems are failing management and their Boards due to their inability to measure, aggregate and report risk exposures as they accumulate. In reaction to the current financial crisis the Boards of many firms are assigning the additional task of oversight of management's risk policies and guidelines to Audit Committees. Accountants are also being asked to discuss the enterprise's key risk exposures with management including those that are beyond financial reporting related risks. The aim of this paper is to consider whether a more comprehensive and timely measurement framework for risk exposure is now needed and to examine one possible approach. The paper introduces a common unit of exposure measurement for a diverse set of business risks and demonstrates how nominal transaction values and relevant quantitative and qualitative risk metrics can be mapped to each transaction and used to calculate a risk adjusted transaction value. The combination of conventional risk measures derived from the capital conventions mandated by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and this proposed risk exposure measurement framework provides the basis for the system of Risk Accounting described in this paper.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call