Abstract

This feasibility study explored the contextual factors influencing office workers’ adherence to an e-health intervention targeting total and prolonged sedentary time over 12 weeks. A three-arm quasi-randomized intervention included prompts at 30 or 60 min intervals delivered via a smartphone application, and a no-prompt comparison arm. Fifty-six office workers completed baseline (64% female) and 44 completed the 12 week follow-up (80% retention). Ecological momentary assessments (EMA) captured contextual data, with 82.8 ± 24.9 EMA prompt questionnaires completed weekly. Two focus groups with n = 8 Prompt 30 and 60 participants were conducted one-month post-intervention to address intervention acceptability and feasibility. Contextual findings indicate that when working on a sedentary task (i.e., reading or screen-based work) and located at an individual workstation, hourly prompts may be more acceptable and feasible for promoting a reduction in total and prolonged sedentary time compared to 30 min prompts. Interpersonal support also appears important for promoting subtle shifts in sedentary working practices. This novel study gives a real-time insight into the factors influencing adherence to e-health prompts. Findings identified unique, pragmatic considerations for delivering a workplace e-health intervention, indicating that further research is warranted to optimize the method of intervention delivery prior to evaluation of a large-scale intervention.

Highlights

  • IntroductionOccupational sedentary time is the largest contributor to total weekday sedentary time among office workers [1], with employed adults in the UK typically spending between

  • (no-prompt comparison n = 15, 71%; Prompt 30 n = 15, 75%; Prompt 60 n = 15, 100%) of total participants retained throughout the trial

  • Our findings indicate that the e-health smartphone application may work as a tool to increase understanding and awareness of sedentary behaviors among deskbased employees

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Occupational sedentary time is the largest contributor to total weekday sedentary time among office workers [1], with employed adults in the UK typically spending between. Of particular concern is that desk-based workers in the UK spend over half of their sedentary time in prolonged bouts of either. ≥30 or ≥55 min [3] This protracted volume of total and prolonged sedentary behavior (SB) is associated with adverse health, well-being and work outcomes, including increased cardiometabolic risk factors [4,5], musculoskeletal discomfort [6,7], impaired cerebral blood flow [8] and lower productivity [9]. Given the high exposure of office and desk-based workers to these potential health risks, there is an urgent need to target sedentary working

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.