Abstract

We present a novel and fully automated fundus image processing technique for glaucoma prescreening based on the rim-to-disc ratio (RDR). The technique accurately segments the optic disc and optic cup and then computes the RDR based on which it is possible to differentiate a normal fundus from a glaucomatous one. The technique performs a further categorization into normal, moderate, or severely glaucomatous classes following the disc-damage-likelihood scale (DDLS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first engineering attempt at using RDR and DDLS to perform glaucoma severity assessment. The segmentation of the optic disc and cup is based on the active disc, whose parameters are optimized to maximize the local contrast. The optimization is performed efficiently by means of a multiscale representation, accelerated gradient-descent, and Green’s theorem. Validations are performed on several publicly available databases as well as data provided by manufacturers of some commercially available fundus imaging devices. The segmentation and classification performance is assessed against expert clinician annotations in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Jaccard, and Dice similarity indices. The results show that RDR based automated glaucoma assessment is about 8% to 10% more accurate than a cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) based system. An ablation study carried out considering the ground-truth expert outlines alone for classification showed that RDR is superior to CDR by 5.28% in a two-stage classification and about 3.21% in a three-stage severity grading.

Highlights

  • Since glaucoma alters the optic disc topography, commonly known as cupping, and associated loss of the visual field, it is treated based upon the structural appearance of the optic disc and its function by means of a fundus image

  • The overall classification accuracy (OCA) over a database is defined as the ratio of the number of images correctly classified to the total number of images used for evaluation from that database

  • The OCA is higher for rim-to-disc ratio (RDR) based assessment compared with cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) and Inferior ≥ Superior ≥ Nasal ≥ Temporal (ISNT)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since glaucoma alters the optic disc topography, commonly known as cupping, and associated loss of the visual field, it is treated based upon the structural appearance of the optic disc and its function by means of a fundus image. Since 1960s, CDR has been the most commonly used parameter for measuring the relative amount of cupping It has two limitations: (i) it does not reflect the size of the optic disc and the position of the cup; and (ii) it does not take into account the amount of loss of nerve fibers in the neuroretinal rim, which directly determines the loss of the visual field. Abdul Majid et al conducted a clinical study on 149 patients and categorized them as normal, glaucoma suspect, or with glaucoma, employing a DDLS based grading They established that the DDLS has the best predictive power and showed that it exhibits a close correlation with visual field, CDR, and OCT parameters[20]. Danesh-Meyer et al conducted a HRT-based clinical study on 110 patients for glaucoma prescreening and evaluated the relationship between the DDLS score, global and sectoral optic disc parameters and visual field indices[23]. The objective of this paper is to precisely fill this engineering gap

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call