Abstract

Integrative modeling of macromolecular protein complexes typically involve representing structurally available components of the complex generated using X-ray crystallography, cryo-EM or comparative modeling, as rigid bodies, and sampling their relative spatial arrangements to generate an ensemble of models that are maximally consistent with input information. While there exist some sparse guidelines in the literature for optimizing the resolution of flexible regions used to represent missing residues within and between the rigid components, the process of defining rigid regions is entirely ad-hoc, often leading to several tedious rounds of trial and error between the computational modeler and their experimental collaborator, alternating between guessing a rigid body definition and running a computationally expensive structural sampling using this definition, until the model achieves both a desirable precision and a quantifiably good fit to input data.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.