Abstract
Existing accounts of the relationship between human rights and climate change are not explicit regarding the link between climate change and the displacement of indigenous peoples and its implications for their rights in Africa. Even if a link exists, legal redress is problematic in that an extraterritorial conduct or omission of a state within and outside Africa may feature in climate-induced displacement. Little is known on the way forward to address this challenge. The article demonstrates how climate change is linked to the displacement of indigenous peoples and how their rights are threatened in Africa. Underscoring the extraterritorial nature of activities underlying their displacement, the article examines the basis of the Kampala Convention and the way it may be applied extraterritorially to enhance the protection of indigenous peoples facing climate-induced displacement and the threat to key rights in Africa.
Highlights
SummaryExisting accounts of the relationship between human rights and climate change are not explicit regarding the link between climate change and the displacement of indigenous peoples and its implications for their rights in Africa
Human activities are increasing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, enhancing the greenhouse effect which, in turn, has led to an increased warming of the earth surface, resulting in climate change and, negatively affects society.[1]
The fact that the African Union (AU) is not a party or cannot make the article 34(6) declaration of the Protocol should not constitute a bar to lodging a complaint before the African Commission and the African Court by indigenous peoples displaced by climate change in respect of the specific AU obligations arising from the Kampala Convention
Summary
Existing accounts of the relationship between human rights and climate change are not explicit regarding the link between climate change and the displacement of indigenous peoples and its implications for their rights in Africa. Even if a link exists, legal redress is problematic in that an extraterritorial conduct or omission of a state within and outside Africa may feature in climate-induced displacement. The article demonstrates how climate change is linked to the displacement of indigenous peoples and how their rights are threatened in Africa. Underscoring the extraterritorial nature of activities underlying their displacement, the article examines the basis of the Kampala Convention and the way it may be applied extraterritorially to enhance the protection of indigenous peoples facing climate-induced displacement and the threat to key rights in Africa
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have