Abstract
Abstract Hunter v Moss is a landmark, but also controversial, English trusts law case. In this article, we argue that Hunter v Moss is, indeed, not as controversial or problematic as the academic critics have portrayed it to be, by explaining why those criticisms do not stand. We then argue that the biggest problem with this judgment is its inability to accommodate cases with a financial context, and we propose that the common law courts should rather adopt a facts-based approach.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
