Abstract

ABSTRACT Terrorist attacks often lead to public backlashes. Following the attacks on July 22, 2011 in Norway, Norwegians showed support for democratic values such as “openness,” “democracy,” and “tolerance” in the public debate and in the commemorations across the country. They also reported higher out-group trust. This paper explores two possible reasons for this increase in trust using a unique panel fielded before and right after the attacks. The first is that cognitive dissonance led people to dissociate from the terrorist and his ideology. The second is that the increase in trust was a response to the public backlash after the attacks. The increase in trust was not caused by cognitive dissonance. Rather, people who were already positive towards immigration, or who saw positive effects of the attacks, became more trusting than others did, and Progress Party supporters increased their trust less than others. These findings are interpreted as a response to the attacks and the political characteristics of the backlash. The study concludes by discussing implications for our understanding of the different consequences of attacks for the terrorists’ imagined constituencies and for the broader public.

Highlights

  • Terrorists are often motivated by a wish to increase publicity and support for their cause

  • The general increase in out-group trust was not caused by cognitive dissonance in people who were negative towards immigration or who were identifying with the Progress Party

  • The results show an effect of prior attitudes that is the opposite of the one hypothesized

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Terrorists are often motivated by a wish to increase publicity and support for their cause. Intercept Lagged out-group trust Age (below 30) Age (from 30 to 45) Age (above 60) Male Higher education Progress Party identification Attitude towards immigration Institutional trust Political interest Rose marches More ethnic antagonism More togetherness Less able to voice opinion National threat Confidence in counter-terrorism Personal threat Interaction: attitude towards immigration and identification with the Progress party N R2 Adjusted R2 (1)

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call