Abstract

Background. Despite current trends toward early primary repair, the surgical systemic-to-pulmonary shunt is still considered the first-choice palliation in patients with critical tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) and duct-dependent pulmonary circulation unsuitable for primary repair. However, stenting of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) is nowadays emerging as an effective alternative to surgical palliation in selected patients. Methods and results. RVOT stenting is usually performed from a venous route, either femoral or, in selected cases, the right internal jugular vein. Less frequently, mostly in pulmonary infundibular/valvar atresia, this procedure can be performed using a hybrid surgical/interventional approach by surgical exposure of the RVOT, puncture of the atretic valve, and stent deployment under direct vision. The size and type of the most appropriate stent may be chosen, based on ultrasound measurements of the RVOT, to cover the right ventricular infundibulum completely and, at the same time, sparing the pulmonary valve, unless significant pulmonary valve annulus hypoplasia and/or supra-valvular stenosis is a significant component of the obstruction. In the large series so far published, early mortality of RVOT stenting is less than 2%, comparing favourably with either Blalock-Thomas-Taussig shunt or early primary repair. In addition, morbidity and clinical sequelae of this approach do not significantly differ from surgical palliation, even if RVOT stenting shows lesser durability and a higher rate of trans-catheter re-interventions over a mid-term follow-up. Finally, similar but more balanced pulmonary artery growth than surgical palliation following RVOT stenting is reported over a mid-term follow-up. Conclusions. RVOT stenting is a technically feasible, well-tolerated, and effective palliation in critical TOF. This approach is cost-effective with respect to surgical palliation either in high-risk neonates or whenever a short-term pulmonary blood flow source is anticipated due to the early surgical repair. It effectively increases pulmonary blood flow, improves arterial saturation, and promotes balanced pulmonary artery growth over a mid-term follow-up.

Highlights

  • Surgical palliation is advised in the case of neonatal comorbidities and complex associated cardiac lesions that predict higher risk surgical repair

  • Stenting versus mBTTS by a 10-year single-centre retrospective chart review study. They included all the patients who had undergone palliation of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF)-type cardiac malformations, either by modified Blalock-Thomas-Taussig shunt (n = 41) or right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) stenting (n = 60). They found that the RVOT stent group had a lower admission rate to the paediatric intensive care unit (p < 0.001) with a shorter length of stay (p < 0.003) and shorter cardiac ward length of stay (p < 0.001), while the overall mortality until the surgical repair was comparable in both groups (p = 0.698)

  • RVOT stenting is a technically feasible, well-tolerated, and effective palliation in critical TOF patients, at similar or lower risk than surgical palliation. It can effectively improve oxygen saturation and promote pulmonary arterial growth to lower the risk of surgical repair

Read more

Summary

Introduction—Historical Perspective

Arterial duct stabilization by stent implantation to achieve durable patency was consistently reported as a cost-effective palliation in critical TOF, making it possible to finely tailor the shunt magnitude to the individual patient [4,17,18,19] This approach showed favourable effects compared to surgery in increasing the oxygen saturation and promoting the growth of the pulmonary vascular tree in different pathophysiologic settings [20], due to a significant increase and even distribution of the pulmonary blood flow [21]. In TOF and associated atrioventricular septal defects, RVOT stenting is a safe and effective palliative option [29], promoting pulmonary arterial growth and improving oxygen saturations before surgical repair

Indications and Contraindications
Technical
Results
Limitations
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call