Right ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease: frequency and associated factors

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background. The prognostic value of right ventricle (RV) systolic dysfunction is known. Nearly all data on the importance of right ventricle function is notably focused on its systolic dysfunction, while right ventricle filling is far less studied, perhaps because of challenges in diastolic dysfunction assessment [1]. Independent prognostic value of RV diastolic dysfunction (RVDD) has been identified in certain clinical situations [2], but these studies are few in number. Therefore it is important to continue investigating the right ventricle diastolic function and clarify its possible clinical and prognostic significance in various groups of patients [3]. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of RVDD in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and to identify factors associated with its presence. Material and Methods 200 patients with stable CAD (153 men) were enrolled in the study. Echocardiography was performed on a Vivid S5 ultrasound scanner (GE). We studied clinical data, left ventricular indices, RV systolic and diastolic parameters (Et, At, et", a"t, s"t, TAPSE, and RV Tei index). Depending on the presence or absence of RVDD, all patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 - patients with RVDD (n = 92; 64 [61; 69] years; 73 (79.4%) men) and Group 2 - patients without RVDD (n = 108; 63 [60; 67] years; 80 (74.0%) men). Results. The RV diastolic dysfunction is much more common than its systolic dysfunction in patients with stable CAD (46% and 7.5%, respectively, Fig. 1). Old myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.007), anterior MI (p = 0.001), congestive heart failure (p = 0.030) and peripheral arterial disease (p = 0.030) were more prevalent in patients with RVDD. The end-systolic dimension were higher (p = 0.010), while left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (p = 0.044) and the mitral E/A ratio (p < 0.001) were lower in this group. No significant differences were found between groups in the coronary artery stenosis. Independent predictors of the RVDD presence were increased age, old MI, hyperlipidemia, moderate chronic heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, and decreased LVEF. ROC-curves of studied left ventricular variables (LVEF, ratio E/A and E/e’) association with RVDD is presented in Fig. 2. The areas under the curves were less than 0.7 for all variables, which indicated an unacceptable ability to distinguish. Conclusions. The RV diastolic dysfunction is much more common than its systolic dysfunction in patients with stable CAD. The RVDD presence was predominantly associated with an increase in age and LV systolic dysfunction, but not with coronary artery lesions. The predictive value of RVDD requires further research. Abstract Figure. Abstract Figure.