Abstract

Rickettsiosis is an important cause of febrile illness among travellers visiting Southeast Asia (SEA). The true incidence of rickettsiosis is underestimated; however, murine typhus and scrub typhus are widely distributed across SEA. Among travellers visiting SEA, scrub typhus was mostly reported from Thailand, whereas murine typhus was frequently found in Indonesia. Although most cases are self-limited or present with mild symptoms, a few cases with severe clinical manifestations have been reported. Doxycycline remains the key treatment of rickettsiosis. Some travellers, such as backpackers, trekkers, or cave explorers, are at a higher risk for rickettsiosis than others. Therefore, in resource-limited conditions, empirical treatment should be considered in these travellers. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has contributed to difficulty in the diagnosis of rickettsiosis because of the clinical similarities between these diseases. In addition, physical distancing mandated by COVID-19 management guidelines limits accurate physical examination, resulting in misdiagnosis and delayed treatment of rickettsiosis. This review summarises the characteristics of murine typhus and scrub typhus, describes travel-associated rickettsiosis, and discusses the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rickettsiosis.

Highlights

  • Rickettsiosis ranks fourth among the identifiable aetiologies for febrile immigrants and returning travellers (mean 1.7% of febrile cases (0–7%)) from Africa, followed by those from the continent of Asia [1]

  • Scrub typhus cases were mostly reported from Thailand and Laos, whereas most murine typhus cases were reported from Indonesia

  • Sporadic cases were frequently documented. This was unlike African tick bite fever, which is caused by Rickettsia africae and usually occurs in clusters or outbreaks among travellers who engaged in risky activities while on safari

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rickettsiosis ranks fourth among the identifiable aetiologies for febrile immigrants and returning travellers (mean 1.7% of febrile cases (0–7%)) from Africa, followed by those from the continent of Asia [1]. R. africae, the causal agent of African tick bite fever, is a common rickettsiosis found in travellers [6]. R. typhi, O. tsutsugamushi, and some SFGRs, including R. honei, are important rickettsial species in SEA Both R. typhi and O. tsutsugamushi play a major role in rickettsiosis among SEA residents and travellers returning from SEA [8,9]. Prompt diagnosis and appropriate antibiotic use are the main factors that contribute to survival This narrative review aims to enhance the recognition and understanding of rickettsiosis, SFGR, murine typhus, and scrub typhus, which are widely reported in SEA. Symptoms are usually mild and an eschar might be seen It was used as a reference species in serologic diagnosis tests in SEA [14]. The symptoms are mild and the rash is absent [16]

Murine Typhus
Scrub Typhus
Travel-Associated Rickettsiosis
Reported Cases of Scrub Typhus and Murine Typhus in Travellers from SEA
53 F 59 F 56 M 43 M 37 F
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Rickettsiosis
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.