Abstract
This commentary on David Reisman's article on the work of Richard Titmuss accepts Reisman's view that Titmuss was the most important analyst of the postwar British ‘welfare state’, and that his analysis has much to teach current discussion of welfare. But, it argues, Titmuss' inheritance from the tradition of ethical socialism, especially the work of R.H. Tawney, imparts significant weaknesses to his arguments.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
