Abstract

Richard Falckenberg (1851–1920) was among the first historians of philosophy to support the argument that Nicholas of Cusa was a modern philosopher. It is found in his book Grundzüge der Philosophie des Nicolaus Cusanus mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Lehre vom Erkennen (1880). Already in this work, in fact, Falckenberg puts forward a number of suggestions that little by little will become part of the Cusanian historiography. Among them, above all is the idea that the modernity of Cusanus is derived from his innovative theory of knowledge. Falckenberg’s celebrity would later be reduced and obscured by the most famous historians of philosophy, to whom has been attributed the origin of the modern interpretation of Cusa, Ernst Cassirer and his school. In this article, I want to come back to Falckenberg’s book and recover in a schematic way his main arguments about the proximity of Cusanus to the philosophies of Leibniz, Fichte, and the positivists.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.