Abstract

The present paper deals with the rhetorical nature of the first part of Apuleius’ speech Pro se de magia (§§ 4-25), the importance of which is commonly minimized. This part is better accounted for as a ‘probatio uitae’, through which the orator intends to prove his innocence by exposing the excellence of his past life and character. The process matches Apuleius’ intention to identify his case with that of philosophy itself confronted to the hatred of uneducated and malevolent accusers. The passage on toothpaste (§§ 6-8) in particular lays the foundations for the rhetorical strategy of the entire speech. The defendant fashions himself as the herald/hero of philosophy and culture, whereas the accusers are depicted as barbarous, ignorant and evil creatures. The final snippet featuring the crocodile and his fellow-bird identifies the adverse party with animals (as opposed to the defendant’s humanity) in a disparaging manner not devoid of threatening undertones.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.