Abstract
When the editors suggested this special issue on rhetoric and argument, they play fully appended a sub-title: What every in formal logician should know about rhetoric, but was too shy to ask. The com mon ground on which informal logicians and rhetoricians meet is argumentation, and both parties share a common goal, i.e., understanding argumentation-in theory, practice, and criticism. A well developed theory of argumentation, 1 submjt, requires principles and standards drawn from three sources that, together, make up the contro versial arts par excellence: rhetoric, logic, and dialectic. If that's a fair statement, then it behooves informal logicians to attend to insights derived from rhetorical studies of argumentation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have