Abstract

Human working memory is a capacity- and duration-limited system in which retention and manipulation of information is subject to metacognitive monitoring and control. At least some nonhuman animals appear to also monitor and control the contents of working memory, but only relatively simple cases where animals monitor or control the presence or absence of single memories have been studied. Here we combine a comparatively complex order memory task with methodology that assesses the capacity to introspect about memory. Monkeys observed sequential presentations of five images, and at test, reported which of two images from the list had appeared first during study. Concurrently, they chose to complete or avoid these tests on a trial-by-trial basis. Monkeys “knew when they knew” the correct response. They were less accurate discriminating images that had appeared close in time to one another during study and were more likely to avoid these difficult tests than they were to avoid easier tests. These results indicate that monkeys can metacognitively monitor relatively complex properties of the contents of working memory, including the quality of representations of temporal relations among images.

Highlights

  • To most people, “memory” means information of which we are consciously aware

  • Knowing the extent to which humans and other animals share the same set of memory systems is critical to understanding the evolution of memory and to evaluating the validity of animal models of memory used in neurobiological research

  • These functions of memory often depend on cognitive control, which can be adaptively modified by feedback from cognitive monitoring[9,10]

Read more

Summary

OPEN Rhesus monkeys metacognitively monitor memories of the order of events

Human working memory is a capacity- and duration-limited system in which retention and manipulation of information is subject to metacognitive monitoring and control. Previous reports of memory for the order of events in nonhuman animals provide no evidence regarding whether these memories are metacognitively monitorable, and subject to introspection This is because there was no explicit response animals could make in these tests that is comparable to a human saying “I do not know” or “I do not remember.”. Functionally equivalent to these human responses, essentially reporting whether or not they remember e.g.17–22 One implementation of these techniques consists of providing subjects a choice between taking a memory test for the possibility of a comparatively large reward if correct, or avoiding the memory test with the assurance of a guaranteed small reward e.g.19,20,23,24. Monkeys should be more accurate, on average, on chosen than on forced trials if they are selectively declining more difficult trials and accepting easier ones

Results and Discussion
Methods
Additional Information
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call