Abstract

There are two basic DNA typing methodologies available to the forensic scientist for characterizing biological evidence. The first technology to gain wide use in the forensic arena was typing of DNA for variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) loci by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. RFLP typing is well-defined, provides a high degree of discrimination, and can be accomplished, at times, with less than 50 ng of high molecular weight genomic DNA. This methodology has been validated for forensic applications (Budowle and Baechtel 1990). The other strategy for typing DNA is based on increasing the number of copies of a target sequence of DNA by amplification using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Saiki, et al. 1985). Since the number of target sequences of interest is increased dramatically by PCR, simplified typing methods can be used for determining DNA polymorphisms in a sample. The advantages a PCR-based technology offers, compared with the currently employed RFLP approach, are: 1) augmented sensitivity and specificity, 2) decreased assay time and labor, 3) absence of an isotopic label, and 4) many degraded DNA samples can be amplified by PCR and subsequently typed because alleles amenable to PCR are much smaller in size compared with alleles detected by RFLP analysis. These qualities combine to make PCRbased technologies extremely useful tools for analyzing biological material found at crime scenes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call