Abstract
Three extensions to radio-frequency (RF) tomography for imaging of voids under wide areas of regard are presented. These extensions are motivated by three challenges. One challenge is the lateral wave, which propagates in proximity of the air–earth interface and represents the predominant radiation mechanism for wide-area surveillance, sensing of denied terrain, or close-in sensing. A second challenge is the direct-path coupling between transmitters (Txs) and receivers (Rxs), that affects the measurements. A third challenge is the generation of clutter by the unknown distribution of anomalies embedded in the ground. These challenges are addressed and solved using the following strategies: 1) A forward model for RF tomography that accounts for lateral waves expressed in closed form (for fast computation); 2) a strategy that reduces the direct-path coupling between any Tx–Rx pair; and 3) an improved inversion scheme that is robust with respect to noise, clutter, and high attenuation. A finite-difference time domain simulation of a scenario representing close-in sensing of a denied area is performed, and reconstructed images obtained using the improved and the classical models of RF tomography are compared.
Highlights
THE problem of underground void detection is paramount to secure borders, sensitive areas, and for search & rescue missions
Images of the below-ground scene are reconstructed using the principles of RF Tomography
Qarm G rmr,rnt atn describes the direct path coupling between a particular Tx and Rx pair. The cancellation of this coupling from the measured field is a critical problem in RF Tomography: it can be analytically predicted using (3), in practical cases its magnitude may be up to 50-60 dB higher than the scattered signal
Summary
THE problem of underground void detection is paramount to secure borders, sensitive areas, and for search & rescue missions. A third contribution, given, is an improvement upon the inversion schemes already discussed in literature [3]-[5], based on the findings described by Zhdanov [2] from the geophysical community; this improved method is more robust with respect to perturbations (e.g. clutter) of the measured scattered field.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have