Abstract

Most Neoproterozoic granitoids in the Kuluketage area, northern Tarim Craton are characterized by strongly depleted HREE abundances and high Sr/Y and (La/Yb) N ratios, showing typical geochemical features of adakitic rocks. Zircon U–Pb dating of three adakitic plutons yielded Neoproterozoic ages (754 ± 4, 790 ± 3 and 798 ± 3 Ma). The adakitic granitoids exhibit low MgO and TiO 2 contents. Their low Cr, Co and Ni abundances, low ɛ Hf( t) values (−21 to −11) and high FeO T/MgO ratios (mostly 2.2–2.9) preclude the possibility of being derived from partial melts of delaminated lower crust. The relatively low ɛ Hf( t) values and old Hf two-stage model ages ( T DM 2 = 2 . 42 – 3 .0 2 Ga ) of the adakitic granitoids are similar to those of the basement rocks in the northern Tarim Craton, suggesting that the adakitic rocks were generated by partial melting of basement rocks in a thickened lower crust. Apart from the adakitic granitoids, Neoproterozoic normal I-type granitoids with low Sr/Y and (La/Yb) N ratios are also exposed in this area, and their geochemistry indicates a crustal origin at a shallower depth. Zircon U–Pb dating of the I-type granitoids also yielded a Neoproterozoic age of 785 ± 8 Ma. The petrogenesis of the Neoproterozoic adakitic granitoids suggests that Neoproterozoic crustal thickness in the northern Tarim Craton must have been over 50 km. In combination with the occurrence of coeval mantle-derived dykes and bimodal volcanic rocks, a partial melting scheme triggered by underplating of mantle plume-derived magmas is proposed to interpret the formation of the Neoproterozoic adakitic and I-type granitoids. This model provides an alternative interpretation for the Neoproterozoic craton reworking happened in the Rodinia supercontinent.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call