Abstract
Urban green infrastructure, such as gardens, can mitigate some of the consequences of climate change, e.g. reducing flash-flooding or urban heat islands. Green infrastructure, however, may itself be vulnerable to a changing climate, and not all garden and landscape plant taxa will remain viable under weather scenarios predicted for the future. It has been suggested that cultivated forms of garden plants (hybrids and selected varieties) particularly, will be susceptible to enhanced stress associated with more frequent flooding, drought and rapid oscillations between these hydrological extremes; thus potentially limiting the range of taxa that can be used in gardens in the future. This research explored this concept by evaluating cultivated forms of the common garden plant – Primula, and testing whether these were less resilient to the effects of hydrological extremes than their progenitor species, Primula vulgaris. The results support this hypothesis and demonstrated that cultivated taxa were more susceptible to the hydrological stresses imposed than Primula vulgaris. Interestingly though, those cultivars that superficially resembled the parent species (Primula ‘Cottage Cream’) showed more stress tolerance than others with larger or more ornamental flowers, suggesting a ‘gradient of susceptibility’ within the hybrids. The notion that the most flamboyant cultivars are sacrificing stress tolerance for traits linked with aesthetics is discussed. The data, albeit on one genus only, has implications for the design of gardens/ornamental landscapes for the future and calls for more attention within breeding programmes to enhance abiotic stress tolerance within garden and landscape plants.
Highlights
Urban green space is considered an asset in partially mitigating the effects of climate change on towns and cities
We introduce two other UK native Primula species as comparators, P. excelsior and P. veris, again with the hypothesis that they will outperform the cultivated varieties of P. vulgaris in general stress tolerance, despite being associated with relatively narrow eco-physiological profiles, i.e. preference for wetter and drier regimes, respectively
Primula vulgaris was selected for this research given that both the wild species and cultivated varieties are widely used as ornamentals across temperate parts of the globe (Hayta et al 2016)
Summary
Urban green space is considered an asset in partially mitigating the effects of climate change on towns and cities. Ecosystem services associated with urban green space include, aerial and surface cooling (Oliveira et al 2011; Blanusa et al 2013), reduced risk of flooding through the capture/storage of rainwater (Oberndorfer et al 2007), improved air quality (Baro et al 2014) and providing habitat. Many policy makers recognise that urban green space has a key role in ‘future proofing’ cities against climate change (Demuzere et al 2014). Urban green space itself will not be immune to the effects of a changing climate
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
