Abstract

Cognitive control allows the coordination of cognitive processes to achieve goals. Control may be sustained in anticipation of goal-relevant cues (proactive control) or transient in response to the cues themselves (reactive control). Adolescents typically exhibit a more reactive pattern than adults in the absence of incentives. We investigated how reward modulates cognitive control engagement in a letter-array working memory (WM) task in 30 adolescents (12–17 years) and 20 adults (23–30 years) using a mixed block- and event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging design. After a Baseline run without rewards, participants performed a Reward run where 50% trials were monetarily rewarded. Accuracy and reaction time (RT) differences between Reward and Baseline runs indicated engagement of proactive control, which was associated with increased sustained activity in the bilateral anterior insula (AI), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and right posterior parietal cortex (PPC). RT differences between Reward and No reward trials of the Reward run suggested additional reactive engagement of cognitive control, accompanied with transient activation in bilateral AI, lateral PFC, PPC, supplementary motor area, anterior cingulate cortex, putamen and caudate. Despite behavioural and neural differences during Baseline WM task performance, adolescents and adults showed similar modulations of proactive and reactive control by reward.

Highlights

  • Adolescents’ ability to exert cognitive control is susceptible to potential rewards and affectively charged contexts (Cohen et al, 2016; Crone & Dahl, 2012; van Duijvenvoorde, Peters, Braams, & Crone, 2016)

  • While adults vary in the recruitment of proactive and reactive control as a function of trait factors (Chiew & Braver, 2017; Locke & Braver, 2008), they can flexibly engage the most efficient mode of cognitive control to adapt to contextual demands, as evidenced by changes in response to experimental manipulations

  • We examined the impact of reward on sustained and transient engagement of cognitive control, and whether differences exist between adolescence and adulthood

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adolescents’ ability to exert cognitive control is susceptible to potential rewards and affectively charged contexts (Cohen et al, 2016; Crone & Dahl, 2012; van Duijvenvoorde, Peters, Braams, & Crone, 2016). We explored whether adolescents and adults can adaptively engage cognitive control. Proactive control refers to the sustained maintenance of goal-relevant information in anticipation of a cue. Reactive control refers to the transient reactivation of goals in response to a cue. Reactive control is less demanding than proactive control, but more 37 susceptible to interference (Braver, 2012; Chiew & Braver, 2017). While adults vary in the recruitment of proactive and reactive control as a function of trait factors (Chiew & Braver, 2017; Locke & Braver, 2008), they can flexibly engage the most efficient mode of cognitive control to adapt to contextual demands, as evidenced by changes in response to experimental manipulations

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call