Abstract

AbstractWhy states comply with international law has long been at the forefront of international law and international relations scholarship. The compliance discussion has largely focused on negative incentives. We argue that there is another, undertheorized mechanism: rewarding. We provide a typology and illustrations of how rewards can be applied. Furthermore, we explore the rationale, potential, and limitations of rewarding, drawing on rationalist and psychological approaches. Both approaches provide ample justifications for making greater use of rewarding in international law.

Highlights

  • Within a state, compliance with legal rules can be secured through the courts and the police power

  • Lacking an “international sheriff” to force states to obey international law, the international system relies on the traditional concept of self-help and countermeasures

  • Rewarding is an important mechanism for compliance with international law

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Compliance with legal rules can be secured through the courts and the police power. Lacking an “international sheriff” to force states to obey international law, the international system relies on the traditional concept of self-help and countermeasures The weakness of this decentralized system persists despite the proliferation of international courts and tribunals as well as the legally binding resolutions of the UN Security Council. Holding states to legal obligations poses conceptual as well as practical problems, making the questions of enforcement and compliance central to the study of international law.[2] Compliance theory provides an understanding of why states fulfill their international obligations, focusing on the design and operation of possible enforcement mechanisms.[3] International legal and IR scholarship have predominantly focused on negative incentives to comply.[4] the costliness of penalties and their ineffectiveness have been thoroughly discussed, they remain at the forefront of academic and policy discussions. We denote in the text if we refer to a specific meaning; otherwise we use compliance as an overall term

One notable exception is
17 Seminal on that topic
COMPLIANCE MECHANISMS IN THE LITERATURE
REWARDING
Typology of Rewarding
Illustrations of Rewarding
Illustrations of Internal Rewarding
Illustrations of External Rewarding
REWARDS VERSUS PENALTIES: A RATIONALIST ANALYSIS
Rewarders’ and Volunteers’ Dilemmas
Pareto Efficiency
Reputation of the Enforcing Country
Monitoring
Applying Behavioral Insights to States
The Difference in Perception
The Difference in Response
The Difference in Stability
Summary
WHEN WILL REWARDS WORK BEST?
Limitations to Rewarding
Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection
Crowding-Out
Conditions Conducive to Rewarding
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.