Abstract

Past decades have witnessed substantial progress in understanding of neurobiological mechanisms that contribute to generation of various PTSD symptoms, including intrusive memories, physiological arousal and avoidance of trauma reminders. However, the neurobiology of anhedonia and emotional numbing in PTSD, that have been conceptualized as reward processing deficits - reward wanting (anticipation of reward) and reward liking (satisfaction with reward outcome), respectively, remains largely unexplored. Empirical evidence on reward processing in PTSD is rather limited, and no studies have examined association of reward processing abnormalities and neurocircuitry-based models of PTSD pathophysiology. The manuscript briefly summarizes “state of the science” of both human reward processing, and of PTSD implicated neurocircuitry, as well as empirical evidence of reward processing deficits in PTSD. We then summarize current gaps in the literature and outline key future directions, further illustrating it by the example of two alternative explanations of PTSD pathophysiology potentially affecting reward processing via different neurobiological pathways. Studying reward processing in PTSD will not only advance the understanding of their link, but also could enhance current treatment approaches by specifically targeting anhedonia and emotional symptoms in PTSD patients.

Highlights

  • Reward Processing and Circuit Dysregulation in Posttraumatic Stress DisorderEdited by: Brian Edward Engdahl, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States. Specialty section: This article was submitted to Mood and Anxiety Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a highly debilitating psychiatric condition that produces immense suffering and incurs substantial individual and societal costs

  • The cluster of negative cognition/mood incorporate a broad range of symptoms, including (a) symptoms associated with inability to experience positive emotions previously referred to as “emotional numbing” (b) symptoms of anhedonia i.e., loss of interest or motivation to participate in significant activities; and (c) symptoms that represent a generally negative cognitive-emotional state with exaggerated negative beliefs and distorted blame of self and others

Read more

Summary

Reward Processing and Circuit Dysregulation in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Edited by: Brian Edward Engdahl, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States. Specialty section: This article was submitted to Mood and Anxiety Disorders, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry. Empirical evidence on reward processing in PTSD is rather limited, and no studies have examined association of reward processing abnormalities and neurocircuitry-based models of PTSD pathophysiology. The manuscript briefly summarizes “state of the science” of both human reward processing, and of PTSD implicated neurocircuitry, as well as empirical evidence of reward processing deficits in PTSD. We summarize current gaps in the literature and outline key future directions, further illustrating it by the example of two alternative explanations of PTSD pathophysiology potentially affecting reward processing via different neurobiological pathways. Studying reward processing in PTSD will advance the understanding of their link, and could enhance current treatment approaches by targeting anhedonia and emotional symptoms in PTSD patients

INTRODUCTION
Reward Processing in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Animal Studies
Human Studies
REWARD PROCESSING IN PTSD
Reward Outcome
Reward Anticipation
Delineating Neural Mechanisms of Distinct Components of Reward Processing
Understanding the Reward Outcome Phase
Type of Reward Used
Understanding at the Molecular Level

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.