Abstract

Although it has been suggested that reward expectation affects the performance of spatial working memory tasks, controversial results have been found in previous experiments. Hence, it is still unclear to what extent reward expectation has an effect on working memory. To clarify this question, a memory-guided saccade task was applied, in which participants were instructed to retain and reconstruct a temporospatial sequence of four locations by moving their eyes in each trial. The global- and local-level spatial working memory accuracies were calculated to determine the reward effect on the global and local level of processing in spatial working memory tasks. Although high reward expectation enhanced the encoding of spatial information, the percentage of trials in which the cued location was correctly fixated decreased with increment of reward expectation. The reconstruction of the global temporospatial sequence was enhanced by reward expectation, whereas the local reconstruction performance was not affected by reward. Furthermore, the improvements in local representations of uncued locations and local sequences were at the cost of the representation of cued locations. The results suggest that the reward effect on spatial working memory is modulated by the level of processing, which supports the flexible resource theory during maintenance.

Highlights

  • Working memory plays an essential role in human adaptive behavior and lies at the core of cognitive psychology research since its birth

  • The fixation duration was significantly affected by reward expectation [MNo−reward = (362 ± 14) ms; MLow−reward =

  • Reward expectation effects were significant for fixation durations of both reward cue [F(2, 38) = 6.020, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.241] and non-cue disks [F(2, 38) = 23.120, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.549]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Working memory plays an essential role in human adaptive behavior and lies at the core of cognitive psychology research since its birth. The total capacity of working memory is not fixed; it varies across individuals (Just and Carpenter, 1992; Barrett et al, 2004) and can even be improved by motivation within the same individual (Krawczyk et al, 2007; Heitz et al, 2008; Kawasaki and Yamaguchi, 2013). It has been proposed that reward expectation improves working memory capacity by encouraging participants to make more efforts to fulfill the working memory tasks (Gilbert and Fiez, 2004; Hopstaken et al, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call