Abstract

Referral reward design is the core component of customer referral programs, which are often applied to recruit new customers. This research investigates the effectiveness of utilitarian vs. hedonic rewards in terms of referral generation. Through one field study and two laboratory studies, we demonstrate a reward–product congruency effect; that is, utilitarian rewards, compared with hedonic rewards, yield a higher referral likelihood for utilitarian products, while the opposite holds true for hedonic products. However, such a congruency effect would be crippled by gender segmentation. When males make referral decisions toward hedonic products, the effectiveness of utilitarian rewards is at least equal to that of hedonic rewards. When females make referral decisions toward utilitarian products, there is no difference in effectiveness between utilitarian and hedonic rewards. These findings provide novel insights into referral reward design.

Highlights

  • Firms often offer rewards, such as cash, coupons, or gifts, to existing customers and encourage these customers to refer new customers

  • Through one field experiment and two laboratory experiments, we demonstrated a reward–product congruency effect existing in customer referral programs (CRPs)

  • Considering that the effect of BCF would not collapse completely, we propose the following hypothesis: TABLE 1 | Preferred reward type based on benefit congruency framework (BCF) and gender-specific preference (GSP)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Firms often offer rewards, such as cash, coupons, or gifts, to existing customers and encourage these customers to refer new customers. Such customer referral programs (CRPs) have long been considered an effective means of new customer acquisition because people often trust the referrals of friends during the buying process (Ryu and Feick, 2007; Dose et al, 2019). Existing customers often respond to CRPs not as actively as firms expect for a variety of reasons (Ryu and Feick, 2007; Wirtz et al, 2013).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.