Abstract
Hannah Arendt argues that after World War II, preparing for war is the continuation of politics by other means, and protest movements and violent uprisings are mere extensions of violence. Jean-Paul Sartre, on the other hand, maintains that revolutionary violence is in some situations justified when it is necessary for the removal of subhuman conditions of the oppressed in order to create a future that reaffirms humanity. In our recent past decades, uprising in the Middle East has given way to armed interventions justified under the Responsibility to Protect (RtoP). Are these uprisings mere extensions of violence or justified revolutionary violence? Is RtoP considered a continuation of politics or an extension of violence?
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
