Abstract
This paper discusses what institutional model is best able to address identified deficiencies in enforcement of the Electronic Communications Framework, ie lack of consistency and independence of NRAs. An examination of the three paradigm models otherwise available in EC law reveals that the current 'network-based' model is basically sound. While it should be strengthened and supplemented, it should not be replaced. The author argues that it is time to move beyond these 'basic' questions of institutionalization to the more fundamental question of the constitutionalization of this model, through a debate on the legitimacy and accountability of its central construct: the ERG.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
