Abstract

This article describes how contemporary publics think about the nation along Kohn’s classic distinction between “civic” and “ethnic” nationalism. The article makes three contributes to the existing literature. Firstly, it establishes a simple conceptual framework, which facilitates a better interpretation of the two-dimensional structure found in this and previous empirical studies. Secondly, it uses multi-classification-analysis to establish and interpret the two-dimensional space. The main logic is that perceptions of nationhood evolve in a contested “field” or “space.” Thirdly, the article demonstrates how countries are not permanently dominated by one perception of nationhood. Using three rounds of ISSP data, the article shows remarkable changes in perceptions of nationhood within the last two decades in some countries and stability in others.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.