Revisiting the quest for a universal log-law and the role of pressure gradient in “canonical” wall-bounded turbulent flows

Abstract

The trinity of so-called "canonical" wall-bounded turbulent flows, comprising the zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer, abbreviated ZPG TBL, turbulent pipe flow and channel/duct flows has continued to receive intense attention as new and more reliable experimental data have become available. Nevertheless, the debate on whether the logarithmic part of the mean velocity profile, in particular the K\'arm\'an constant $\kappa$, is identical for these three canonical flows or flow-dependent is still ongoing. In this paper, which expands upon Monkewitz and Nagib (24th ICTAM Conf., Montreal, 2016), the asymptotic matching requirement of equal $\kappa$ in the log-law and in the expression for the centerline/free-stream velocity is reiterated and shown to preclude a single universal log-law in the three canonical flows or at least make it very unlikely. The current re-analysis of high quality mean velocity profiles in ZPG TBL's, the Princeton "Superpipe" and in channels and ducts leads to a coherent description of (almost) all seemingly contradictory data interpretations in terms of TWO logarithmic regions in pipes and channels: A universal interior, near-wall logarithmic region with the same parameters as in the ZPG TBL, in particular $\kappa_{\mathrm{wall}} \cong 0.384$, but only extending from around $150$ to around $10^3$ wall units, and shrinking with increasing pressure gradient, followed by an exterior logarithmic region with a flow specific $\kappa$ matching the logarithmic slope of the respective free-stream or centerline velocity. The log-law parameters of the exterior logarithmic region in channels and pipes are shown to depend monotonically on the pressure gradient.