Abstract

The objective of this article is to explore the interconnections between the choice of conceptual and methodological frameworks and resulting institutional reform and policy processes and to do so from a broad developmental perspective. It builds on the analytical framework developed in past research which examined the links between issues of regulation and legitimacy in the African mining sector. It draws attention to the structural relations of power institutionalised and reproduced by past regulatory frameworks, in order to analyse how this heritage has conditioned approaches to artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) and, in turn, policy proposals. The article uses ASM as an example to illustrate the need to rethink appropriate categories to capture shifting boundaries and to re-assess approaches as preconditions to renew institutional reform and policy processes from a country-specific and participative perspective.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.