Abstract
Hunter Gaston Discriminatory Index (HGDI) is a widely used estimator of discriminatory power of genotyping methods and diversity of molecular markers in bacterial pathogens, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In my opinion, the index is somewhat misleading: a closer look at common practice and particular studies reveals that values in the range of 0.6–0.9 are modest but uncritically perceived as high. I propose and discuss three courses of change: (i) to continue using HGDI but be aware of the true meaning behind its value and increase a threshold of acceptable resolution to the more adequate values of 0.90–0.99, depending on study design; (ii) to turn to other known indices of diversity (e.g., Shannon index), in order to complement HGDI; (iii) to develop new, intuitively more realistic estimator.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
