Abstract

The integrated character of the sustainable development goals in Agenda 2030, as well as research in environmental security, flag that sustainable peace requires sustainable and conflict-sensitive natural resource use. The precise relationship between the risk for violent conflict and natural resources remains contested because of the interplay with socio-economic variables. This paper aims to improve the understanding of natural resources’ role in the risk of violent conflicts by accounting for complex interactions with socio-economic conditions. Conflict data was analysed with machine learning techniques, which can account for complex patterns, such as variable interactions. More commonly used logistic regression models are compared with neural network models and random forest models. The results indicate that a country’s natural resource features are important predictors of its risk for violent conflict and that they interact with socio-economic conditions. Based on these empirical results and the existing literature, we interpret that natural resources can be root causes of violent intrastate conflict, and that signals from natural resources leading to conflict risk are reflected in and influenced by interacting socio-economic conditions. More specifically, the results show that variables such as access to water and food security are important predictors of conflict, while resource rents and oil and ore exports are relatively less important than other natural resource variables, contrasting what prior research has suggested. Given the potential of natural resource features to act as an early warning for violent conflict, we argue that natural resources should be included in conflict risk models for conflict prevention.

Highlights

  • Both peace and sustainable natural resource management are integral parts of the interlinked Sustainable Development Goals of Agenda 2030 [1]

  • Models based on only natural resource variables perform much worse when applying logistic regression, slightly worse in the neural networks, but slightly better when applying random forest compared to all other variable sets (Figure 1)

  • This study found that natural resource variables are important predictors of conflict, though we interpret their effects to be often captured by the intervening socio-economic variables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Both peace and sustainable natural resource management are integral parts of the interlinked Sustainable Development Goals of Agenda 2030 [1]. Homer-Dixon [2] demonstrated in the early 1990s with six case studies how natural resource scarcities lead to violent conflict and thereby opened the scientific discussion. He concluded that violence due to natural resource scarcity ‘will usually be sub-national, persistent, and diffuse’ [2] Sachs and Warner [3] statistically showed that natural resource abundance hinders development and termed this process the ‘resource curse’. Finances from natural resource exploitation support rebellion. A largely resource dependent economy presents serious governmental challenges to avoid grievances over unequal distribution of revenues

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call