Abstract
AbstractThis note reviews and presents the two dominant models of thermoelasticity developed by (1) Peter Chadwick and (2) S.C.H Lu and Karl S. Pister. Both models are widely used and cited in the literature but their differences are not well delineated in a clear and accessible way. Here we briefly review the two models using a unified notation and discuss and compare their basic properties and behavior. We show that all Lu and Pister models can be written as a Chadwick model. However a Chadwick model does not fully specify a Lu and Pister model. Additional (mild) assumptions must be made to convert a Chadwick model into a Lu and Pister model. A model due to L. Anand is also presented to show its conformity to both frameworks and to highlight its usefulness.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
