Abstract

This article revisits from the perspective of finite mixture modeling the increasingly popular bi-factor model applied in contemporary behavioral and social research. It is pointed out that in a population with substantial unobserved heterogeneity resulting from a mixture of latent classes, and where the unidimensional model holds along with models that markedly differ from the bi-factor model, the latter may turn out to be spuriously plausible. To raise caution about this possibility, an example of a 3-class setting is provided, where correspondingly (a) the single (global) factor model, (b) a model with a global factor and a single local factor, and (c) a model with a global factor and two local factors hold, while the bi-factor model with a global factor and three local factors is also plausible for the analyzed data overall. Examination of population heterogeneity prior to testing the bi-factor model is therefore recommendable in empirical research, in order to avoid spurious findings of its plausibility when ignoring substantial unobserved heterogeneity in studied populations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call