Abstract

BackgroundAmong others, the productive use of surplus labor is a viable mechanism to transform the agricultural sector and thus the whole economy in low-income countries. It is critically important to understand the factors that condition labor productivity to design and deploy effective agricultural and labor market policies. A few studies confirm that, at low-income levels, improving nutrition can contribute to the labor productivity of households. These studies rely heavily on self-reported farm data, which are prone to systematic and random measurement errors. The empirical evidence on this topic remains inadequate and inconclusive for this reason. Here, we substantiate whether better nutritional status enhances the labor productivity of farm households using objective measures of plot-level data from a recent household survey in Ethiopia. We also employ alternative measures of nutrition status indicators known as, Food Consumption Score (FCS) and Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS), inter alia, to capture additional aspects of nutrition such as diet quality and diversity, which are overlooked by calorie intake data. To deal with possible endogeneity, we employ a panel fixed effect estimation technique with a rich set of household socioeconomic and plot characteristics.ResultsWe observe that the impact of current nutritional status, as measured by HDDS, on labor productivity varies considerably depending on the initial level of diet quality and diversity with a stronger and positive effect for low-consumption households. In an alternative specification, we also observe a positive farm labor productivity effect of current nutritional status as measured by FCS with a homogenous effect across households. However, the effect of the outcome of past nutritional status as evaluated by the Activity of Daily Living Index (ADLI) seems negligible.ConclusionOur findings indicate that improving nutrition can contribute to farm labor productivity at least for households with low current diet quality and diversity. Also, based on the findings, we conclude that there is a possibility of a low consumption–low productivity trap in Ethiopia.

Highlights

  • Agriculture is the livelihood of more than 70 percent of the population in low-income countries [14]

  • The results suggest that the impact of nutrition on farm labor productivity is positive for both groups but the result seems insignificant for the female head

  • In this study, we try to look into the impact of nutritional status on family farm labor productivity using Living Standard Measurement Study Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (LSMS-ISA) data for Ethiopia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Agriculture is the livelihood of more than 70 percent of the population in low-income countries [14]. Malnutrition and undernutrition arise from a deficiency in the diet of iron and inadequate intake of energy and protein, respectively [26]. According to him, such nutritional predicaments reduce body size because of impaired growth and low oxygen-transporting capacity of the blood, thereby work capacity and intensity will deteriorate. A few studies confirm that, at low-income levels, improving nutrition can contribute to the labor productivity of households These studies rely heavily on self-reported farm data, which are prone to systematic and random measurement errors. To deal with possible endogeneity, we employ a panel fixed effect estimation technique with a rich set of household socioeconomic and plot characteristics

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call