Abstract

Previous reports stated that patients with coronary artery fistula (CAF) and angina pectoris mostly had perfusion defects on 201Tl-myocardial perfusion SPECT with dipyridamole stress (dipyridamole 201Tl-MPI). These perfusion defects were reversible or of reversed redistribution patterns, and the mechanism was generally considered as steal phenomenon. Four patients with angina pectoris and major risk factors of coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing dipyridamole 201Tl-MPI and coronary angiography (CAG) in our hospital from 1995 to 1999 were found to have CAFs. The durations between the two examinations were two weeks to one year. Except one case with 50%-60% of coronary artery stenosis and CAF in the middle segment of left anterior descending artery (LAD) had perfusion defect in the apical wall of left ventricle (LV) on MPI, all others did not have corresponding perfusion defect in the coronary territories with CAF, even if concomitant coronary stenosis or double CAF was present. The prevalence of corresponding perfusion defect on dipyridamole 201Tl-MPI in patients with CAF and angina pectoris in our series is not as high as previously reported. It is not rare for a patient with concomitant CAF and coronary stenosis in the same vessel to have no corresponding perfusion defect on dipyridamole 201Tl-MPI. Further studies to correlate shunt ratio of CAF with manifestations of dipyridamole 201Tl-MPI, to characterize dipyridamole-induced hemodynamic changes of the coronary territory with CAF relative to other territories, and comparing the diagnostic performances of vasodilator versus dobutamine or exercise stress MPI for CAF may be promising.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.